Jefferson did not believe that all men are created equal

US as a Christian Nation, Christian Right No Comments

Most Americans, including Senator John McCain, believe that that “the Constitution established the United States of America as a Christian nation.” Jon Meacham does a good job of demonstrating the inaccuracy of this notion. But when he writes that the “founding principle of the nation” was that “all men are created equal,” he fails to mention the obvious fact that men like Washington and Jefferson, who eloquently defended the separation of religion and state, did not really believe that “all men are created equal.” This famous phrase appears in the Declaration of Independence, the original draft of which Jefferson wrote in June of 1776. John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and other members of the Continental Congress made some changes to Jefferson’s draft before it was finally approved on July 4. In the list of the offenses of the British king listed in this text, we find the sentence: “He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.” Jefferson and his colleagues had no trouble understanding the grievances of the European colonists vis-à-vis the British, but they were incapable of understanding the grievances of the “Indian Savages” who were defending themselves against foreign colonists who were taking their land. When he was president, Jefferson wrote Secretary of War Henry Dearborn on August 28, 1807 that “if ever we are constrained to lift the hatchet against any tribe, we will never lay it down till that tribe is exterminated, or driven beyond the Missisipi [sic].” In a later letter to John Adams, dated June 11, 1812, Jefferson wrote that despite the progress of some “Indian Nations,” many “will relapse into barbarism & misery, lose numbers by war & want, and we shall be obliged to drive them, with the beasts of the forest into the Stony mountains.” As for Jefferson’s slaves, he obviously did not see them as equal to white men. He also obviously did not view women as the equals of men. (Women did not gain the right to vote until the nineteenth amendment to the Constitution was ratified in 1920.) So when Jefferson and his peers declared that “all men are created equal,” they meant that all white males are created equal. Like most people, they shared most of the biases that prevailed in the society in which they were immersed. There were some things they simply could not see.

Meacham, A Nation of Christians Is Not a Christian Nation - New York Times, October 7, 2007

The only acknowledgment of religion in the original Constitution is a utilitarian one: the document is dated “in the year of our Lord 1787.” Even the religion clause of the First Amendment is framed dryly and without reference to any particular faith….

Thomas Jefferson said that his bill for religious liberty in Virginia was “meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and the Mahometan, the Hindu, and infidel of every denomination.” When George Washington was inaugurated in New York in April 1789, Gershom Seixas, the hazan of Shearith Israel, was listed among the city’s clergymen (there were 14 in New York at the time) - a sign of acceptance and respect. The next year, Washington wrote the Hebrew Congregation of Newport, R.I., saying, “happily the government of the United States … gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance. … Everyone shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.”

Andrew Jackson resisted bids in the 1820s to form a “Christian party in politics.” Abraham Lincoln buried a proposed “Christian amendment” to the Constitution to declare the nation’s fealty to Jesus. Theodore Roosevelt defended William Howard Taft, a Unitarian, from religious attacks by supporters of William Jennings Bryan.

The founders were not anti-religion. Many of them were faithful in their personal lives, and in their public language they evoked God. They grounded the founding principle of the nation - that all men are created equal - in the divine.

Tony Judt Quotes Camus: “Mistaken ideas always end in bloodshed,” he wrote, “but in every case it is someone else’s blood.”

War on Terror as Misguided Metaphor No Comments

Tony Judt, From Military Disaster to Moral High Ground - New York Times, October 7, 2007

In a democracy, war should always be the last resort - no matter how good the cause. “To jaw-jaw,” as Churchill reminded Eisenhower, “is always better than to war-war.” So the next time someone waxes lyrical for armed overseas intervention in the name of liberal ideals or “defining struggles,” remember what Albert Camus had to say about his fellow intellectuals’ propensity for encouraging violence to others at a safe distance from themselves. Albert Camus had to say about his fellow intellectuals’ propensity for encouraging violence to others at a safe distance from themselves. “Mistaken ideas always end in bloodshed,” he wrote, “but in every case it is someone else’s blood. That is why some of our thinkers feel free to say just about anything.”

Baptist Manager of Gaza’s Only Christian Bookstore Killed

Palestinian Christians, Gaza under Hamas No Comments

Palestinian Christian activist stabbed to death in Gaza, AP, Haaretz, October 7, 2007

A Palestinian Christian activist who had received repeated death threats was found stabbed to death in a street in Gaza City early Sunday.

Rami Khader Ayyad, 32, was director of the Teacher’s Bookshop, Gaza’s only Christian bookstore, which is run by the Bible Society of Gaza Baptist church.

Health Ministry officials confirmed his death.

Ayyad had been missing since Saturday evening. Over the years he had received repeated death threats from unidentified people displeased with his missionary work.

The Interior Ministry run by Gaza’s Islamic militant Hamas rulers condemned the killing and said it launched an investigation.

“This grave crime will not pass without punishment,” the ministry said in a statement.

About 3,200 Christians live in Gaza, most of them Greek Orthodox. Relations with Gaza’s Muslims are generally good, and have not deteriorated since Hamas wrested control of the strip in mid-June.

But there have been occasional acts of violence, and in April, a bomb severely damaged the Palestinian Bible Society building in Gaza, which has been operating since 1999.

Gideon Levy on Mohammed al-Dura as Icon

Levy 1 Comment

Mohammed al-Dura lives on - Haaretz, October 7, 2007

The concern Israel demonstrates for the fate of one Palestinian boy touches the heart: Again, note what a fuss is being made about the case of the killing of Mohammed al-Dura. Our heart is impervious to the fate of other children who have been killed. Just little Mohammed continues to haunt us. But the question of who killed al-Dura is not important. And maybe he is even alive, as some eccentrics claim. Perhaps he committed suicide, as the strange investigations are liable to suggest.

All of these are tasteless questions designed to divert attention from the truly important issues: According to data collected by human rights group B’Tselem, Israel is responsible for killing more than 850 Palestinian children and teenagers since al-Dura was killed, including 92 in the past year alone. Last October, we killed 31 children in Gaza.

“From a national, Islamic and rational point of view, it is not allowed to fight alongside occupation forces,” said Dari, who heads Iraq’s Muslim Clerics Association

Iraq No Comments

Top cleric asks Iraqis not to join anti-Qaeda fight, Reuters, October 7, 2007

DUBAI (Reuters) - A top Iraqi Sunni cleric urged Iraqis on Friday not to join U.S.-led forces in fighting al Qaeda, saying they would be helping occupiers against compatriots.

“We reject the actions of al Qaeda but they are still part of us … Ninety percent of al Qaeda are Iraqis,” Sheikh Harith al-Dari told Al Jazeera television. “It may be possible to hold a dialogue with them … and God may help them return to reason.”

“From a national, Islamic and rational point of view, it is not allowed to fight alongside occupation forces,” said Dari, who heads Iraq’s Muslim Clerics Association.

But Dari, whose association groups Iraq’s Sunni religious leaders, said self-defence against any al Qaeda attacks was justified.

Jordan-based Dari has praised Sunni Muslim insurgent groups but denied direct links with them.

Muqtada Sadr and Abdelaziz Hakim reach a deal that aims to end clashes between their militias

Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, Shiite Militiamen in Iraqi Army and Police, Mahdi Army, Iraq No Comments

Rival Shiites in Iraq agree to truce - Los Angeles Times, October 7, 2007

BAGHDAD — Radical Shiite cleric Muqtada Sadr and his chief rival, Abdelaziz Hakim, reached a truce Saturday to end bloodshed between their loyalists that has killed scores of Iraqis and raised fears of a new front in the Iraq war.

Officials of Hakim’s Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council said the deal was hammered out during a 4 1/2 -hour meeting between the Shiite Muslim leaders, whose militias have been vying for control of oil-rich southern Iraq. Both sides said they would reveal details today.