Micah Sachs on Amira Hass: When she writes, it is with the passion and conviction of a prophet
December 24, 2007 Amira Hass, Israeli-Palestinian conflict No CommentsMunson: I would question the accuracy of some of the statements in this review of Yifat Kedar’s documentary Between the Lines (2001) about Amira Hass. For example, Sachs writes “from what the film shows, she apparently has no friends in Israeli society.” This seems implausible and biased. I do not know Amira Hass personally and I have not seen this film. But I do know Israelis who revere her–as I do.
Amira Hass is probably the most committed journalist in Israel, for better or worse. When first assigned to cover Gaza by Israel’s best-known daily, Ha’aretz in 1991, she decided to spend part of each month living there. She permanently moved to Gaza after the Oslo peace accords.In 1997, well before the current intifada, she moved to Ramallah, in the West Bank. She remains there to this day, braving power outages, squabbles with the Israel Defense Forces and the Palestinian Authority, tanks and stonings. During her time covering the occupied territories, she has come to a simple conclusion, fervently held: the Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank is a travesty.
If you tend to agree with her, then Israeli director Yifat Kedar’s documentary Between the Lines (2001), about Hass’s life in the West Bank, will confirm your convictions. But even if you don’t, you can’t help but empathize for this lonely, courageous and angry woman.
One of the great powers of film is its ability to make us understand those we might normally demonize. Among other reasons, Schindler’s List (1993) is a masterpiece because Ralph Fiennes makes the viewer understand how a person becomes a Nazi monster.
By showing direct evidence of the indignities, injustice and hate that Palestinians in the occupied territories endure, the film makes us empathize with them. But more importantly, it makes us - and hopefully Israelis - understand why one of their own would choose to live “behind enemy lines.”
It would be easy to dismiss Hass if she had a cozy relationship with the Palestinian Authority. But she does not. She needles P.A. leaders about corruption and lack of democracy just as ruthlessly as she hounds Israeli military flaks about the destruction of Palestinian crops.
When she writes, it is with the passion and conviction of a prophet. Her articles are not possessed with the tone of calm evenhandedness that American readers are accustomed to; her work (available at www.zmag.org/meastwatch/amira_hass.htm) is scathing, judgmental and accusatory.







